<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nails Blog V2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nailsblog.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nailsblog.com</link>
	<description>Web development discussion and online fun.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 19:38:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Scottrade 1 Week Review</title>
		<link>http://nailsblog.com/2010/03/08/scottrade-1-week-review/</link>
		<comments>http://nailsblog.com/2010/03/08/scottrade-1-week-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 19:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cldnails</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Making Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scottrade Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stocks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nailsblog.com/?p=573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I began March with a change in focus, from web development to the ever changing stock market.  However, so far I feel like I've only jumped from one sinking ship to another and my feet are still wet.  However, despite the market fluctuations, I signed up with Scottrade and feel it's time for an early [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I began March with a change in focus, from web development to the ever changing stock market.  However, so far I feel like I've only jumped from one sinking ship to another and my feet are still wet.  However, despite the market fluctuations, I signed up with Scottrade and feel it's time for an early 1 week review of their website and service.</p>
<p><strong>Signing Up</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://nailsblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/scottrade.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-574" title="scottrade" src="http://nailsblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/scottrade.jpg" alt="" width="107" height="107" /></a>First of all, signing up to Scottrade.com can be a daunting experience.  Unlike most websites, this investment website requires sensitive information like Social Security numbers, which some people may not feel comfortable sending over the tubes.  Also, there are a number of forms that must be electronically signed and filled out, which were written by main street's lawyers, meaning myself and others may not completely understand what we are agreeing to.</p>
<p>Luckily there is an answer to the above woes, Scottrade offers the assistance of local offices.  As a matter of fact there is a manned office less than 10 mins from my home.  The employees of Scottrade were more than willing to help me get signed up, answer my noob questions, and allow me to make a check deposit.  So, other than be daunting to sign up via the web, the initial 'sign up' process was a breeze, once the professionals were called in.</p>
<p><strong>Deposit</strong></p>
<p>It's odd, but there is only one electronic option for placing funds into a general Scottrade account.  For example, my initial deposit could only be completed by Money Direct or by physically mailing or dropping off a personal check or money order.  I would have much rather preferred linking my PayPal account for transaction and purchase fees, oh well.</p>
<p>I opted to drop off a personal check, since Scottrade's offices were so close.  The deposit showed up immediately, however the funds were not available for purchase until the next business day.  There were also restrictions on my funds for 2 additional days, stating that I could not purchase shares under $4 ea.  Therefore my penny stock trading had to wait until the full clear process, 3 days after my initial deposit.</p>
<p>Again, the employees of Scottrade were very helpful and explained the restriction process to me.  This also opened up the conversation to what will happen during my first trade.  Right inside the office the personnel walked me through a mock transaction, complete with commission fees and different purchase options.</p>
<p><strong>First Stock Trade</strong></p>
<p>Smooth.  It's true, my first purchase within Scottrade was a smooth transaction that qued, completed, and showed in my account within 10 minutes of me left clicking confirm.  As a matter of fact the entire Trade tab is simplified and easy to understand your options.  Anything that might not be clear is explained in the right hand column or has a question mark link, to take you to an explanation.</p>
<p>A typical trade is done by selecting the stock symbol you wish to trade, amount of shares, type of order, and then the length of time you want the offer to be made.  I only purchase on limits, so a time frame is always required, which I typically set to expire at the end of the day.  After completing the fields you will be given with a review of your order and then a final confirmation.  It's easy peezy, even for someone who has never traded stock before.  Furthermore, the employees at Scottrade are available to assist you over the phone, should you be nervous or have some questions.</p>
<p><strong>Recent Scottrade Site Performance</strong></p>
<p>I have not been satisfied with the Scottrade.com site performance.  I am consistently timing out when requesting a quote and the reports they provide usually never load.  I've bested the Scottrade.com site from 3 different computers on 3 different connections and the problem continues to persist.  In addition, I've tried using 3 different browsers, including FireFox, Chrome, and the latest release of Internet Explorer.  Unfortunately Internet Explorer appears to be the most stable when using Scottrade, go figure.</p>
<p>This morning I was in the process of purchasing some stock at market open, only to find that Scottrade had turned off online trading.  After calling my local office I was informed this is the first time this has ever happened that he can remember.  Lucky me, assuming he was telling the truth, which would also translate this article into an unfair review.  You be the judge and I'll be back in another 30 days to fill you in on all the trades and money I've lost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nailsblog.com/2010/03/08/scottrade-1-week-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Use Chrome For Keyword Density</title>
		<link>http://nailsblog.com/2010/02/25/use-chrome-for-keyword-density/</link>
		<comments>http://nailsblog.com/2010/02/25/use-chrome-for-keyword-density/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cldnails</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keyword density]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nailsblog.com/?p=571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I've stumbled across a great function of Google Chrome to easily find out what kind of keyword density I'm putting into my posts.  Actually, the function within the Google Chrome browser will provide feedback on exactly how many times a word is used on the open page and highlight where that word can be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've stumbled across a great function of Google Chrome to easily find out what kind of keyword density I'm putting into my posts.  Actually, the function within the Google Chrome browser will provide feedback on exactly how many times a word is used on the open page and highlight where that word can be found.</p>
<p>To search the keyword, simply press Ctrl+F, which will bring a drop down in the top right of the browser to enter a search term.  After entering the search term the keyword will be highlighted on the page.  Within the drop down search menu will be a 1 of XX, displaying how many times the keyword was used on the page.</p>
<p>This neat little Chrome trick will help in increasing or decreasing the density of keywords being used on an article.  Although it's also a great tool to use when searching for specific information on a HUGE page full of irrelevant text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nailsblog.com/2010/02/25/use-chrome-for-keyword-density/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Sites and Google Friend Connect</title>
		<link>http://nailsblog.com/2010/02/12/google-sites-and-google-friend-connect/</link>
		<comments>http://nailsblog.com/2010/02/12/google-sites-and-google-friend-connect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 17:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cldnails</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friend Connect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nailsblog.com/?p=564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So Google has just released one of their better social networking applications and we can't even use it on their official Sites pages?  As of this posting there is no way to integrate Google Friend Connect gadgets on Google Sites pages.
I'm working on a few pages that would greatly benefit from having their 'Share This' [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Google has just released one of their better social networking applications and we can't even use it on their official Sites pages?  As of this posting there is no way to integrate <a title="Google Friend Connect" href="http://www.google.com/friendconnect">Google Friend Connect</a> gadgets on <a title="Google Sites" href="http://sites.google.com">Google Sites</a> pages.</p>
<p>I'm working on a few pages that would greatly benefit from having their 'Share This' gadget, along with member signups, and newsletter confirmations.  However, the current state of Google Sites prohibits the use of any code that requires javascript, other than their Adsense which can be added into the sidebar.</p>
<p>The Google Friend Connect code can be added via the html function of Google Sites, but the user is greeted with a warning that the potentially dangerous code will be removed upon viewing.  A la, no more working Google Friend Connect on Google Sites.</p>
<p>I'm not the only one upset that Friend Connect won't work with Sites.  A <a title="Google Sites Forum" href="http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/sites/thread?tid=24a8002c00eb73e1&amp;hl=en">thread on the official Sites Forum</a> has over 43 posts from people looking to add Friend Connect to their personal Google Site pages.  The reason it hasn't been integrated yet, my best guess is that they were too busy copying Twitter to come up with Buzz!.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nailsblog.com/2010/02/12/google-sites-and-google-friend-connect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t Buy Affiliate Espionage</title>
		<link>http://nailsblog.com/2010/02/11/dont-buy-affiliate-espionage/</link>
		<comments>http://nailsblog.com/2010/02/11/dont-buy-affiliate-espionage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cldnails</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Making Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affiliate espionage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nailsblog.com/?p=562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Affiliate Espionage was a phenomenal tool a few months back, which helped the user track advertising trends amongst competitors in Google Adwords.  It provided research on search trends, money spent on campaigns, and which campaigns worked, so the user wasn't throwing money out the door.  It assisted with the tried and true test, test, test [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Affiliate Espionage was a phenomenal tool a few months back, which helped the user track advertising trends amongst competitors in Google Adwords.  It provided research on search trends, money spent on campaigns, and which campaigns worked, so the user wasn't throwing money out the door.  It assisted with the tried and true test, test, test method of spending money on Adwords.  Alas, Affiliate Espionage has closed it's doors and development on the FireFox plugin has come to a hault.</p>
<blockquote><p>It's been a looonnggg time since I last sent out an email to you<br />
but a lot has been going on and unfortunately as a result I have<br />
some bad news to share with you today.</p>
<p>With much thought and struggle, I have decided to close down<br />
Affiliate Espionage.</p>
<p>It has been a fun ride and the feedback and response to AE has<br />
been fantastic over the past 18 months but things have reached a<br />
point where I had to decide which direction to take my business<br />
and focus my efforts and I did not feel I would be able to<br />
provide the support, service and time required to do justice to<br />
the Affiliate Espionage Software while tackling the major<br />
project I will be working on this year.</p>
<p>Effective March 1st 2010, Affiliate Espionage will be taken off<br />
the market.</p>
<p>All existing customers will still have full access to the<br />
Member's only Site indefinitely to access all software, videos,<br />
and manuals.</p>
<p>There may be occasional software updates but there is no<br />
timetable or schedule (or promise of) these updates.</p>
<p>This has not been an easy decision especially since this project<br />
has been part of my life for well over 2 years now.  I<br />
appreciate your support and understanding.</p>
<p>You can still contact our support desk until March 5, 2010 to<br />
address any questions or concerns you may have.</p></blockquote>
<p>So, it looks like it's back to studying trends  the old fashion way and spend lots o pennies on testing Adword Campaigns.  But that's ok, because everything the Affiliate Espionage Plugin did can be done on your own manually, just takes a little bit longer.</p>
<p>If you are looking for alternative revenue streams, please check out my <a title="Chitika Review" href="http://nailsblog.com/2009/04/13/3-day-chitika-review/">Chitika Review</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nailsblog.com/2010/02/11/dont-buy-affiliate-espionage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chrome Extensions Are Lacking</title>
		<link>http://nailsblog.com/2010/02/05/chrome-extensions-are-lacking/</link>
		<comments>http://nailsblog.com/2010/02/05/chrome-extensions-are-lacking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 20:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cldnails</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nailsblog.com/?p=557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google Chrome has offered me a roller coaster of emotions since it's release in September 2008.  I embraced Google's latest endeavor and hint at an OS with open arms, but quickly fell back on tried and true FireFox.  Since then they have released updates that have complicated Chrome's functionality and as of late fixed most [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://nailsblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/google-chrome-extensions.png"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-559" title="Google Chrome Extensions" src="http://nailsblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/google-chrome-extensions-300x37.png" alt="Google Chrome Extensions" width="300" height="37" /></a>Google Chrome has offered me a roller coaster of emotions since it's release in September 2008.  I embraced Google's latest endeavor and hint at an OS with open arms, but quickly fell back on tried and true FireFox.  Since then they have released updates that have complicated Chrome's functionality and as of late fixed most of what frustrated me about it in the first place.  Now, I set here before you, happy and proud that Google Chrome is my primary browser for both work and play.</p>
<p>Since Google has updated Chrome to allow popups for domains, it's found a permanent fixture on my work PC.  No longer must I fight with FireFox's memory leaks and slow to open windows.  As of late I've also found myself feasting on Chrome's ability to use Extensions, which the lack of was a shortfall at launch in 2008.  But, early on in the development stage, quality extensions are few and far between.</p>
<p>Currently I'm only using 3 different Chrome Extensions, which include FasterChrome, Google Mail Checker, and Webpage Screenshot.  It's better than nothing, but they still struggle to meet the sophistication and tweekability found in FireFox addons.  According to developers, it's Google's fault for the way they allow access to their code.  To be honest, it's all lost over my head, I just know what I can use and what I hate.</p>
<p>Taking a quick look through the <a title="top chrome extensions" href="https://chrome.google.com/extensions/list/rating">top Chrome Extensions</a> proves that there isn't enough competition in the marketplace.  Extensions like <a title="ibrii" href="https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/jibehoijjhabehkjkgekmkekkjconbde">ibrii</a> are attempting to farm user information in exchange for their Extension services and an Extension called <a title="Nothing Extension" href="https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/mabenbhpjlchigbbpafligkdnlhjbmel">Nothing</a> is ranked #7 as most installed.  Nothing does just as advertised by the way, man I love dry humor on the internet.</p>
<p>After browsing off of the 1st page of Top Chrome Extensions the pickings start getting real thin.  I've tested a few, but none seem to offer exactly as advertised, or are buggy, or are just not as useful as you'd hope, or all the above.  But I'm not discouraged yet, I've got the extensions I need for adequate use as a primary browser both at work and at home.</p>
<p>It wouldn't be fare to expect as much out of Chrome as what FireFox has to offer, which as been around much longer.  However, I see a changing of the guard in the next 2 years, where FireFox may be ousted as the 2nd most used web browser.  I for one welcome competition in the market place, while keeping my lips wet thinking of a full blown Google OS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nailsblog.com/2010/02/05/chrome-extensions-are-lacking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How To Monetize Google Image Search Traffic</title>
		<link>http://nailsblog.com/2010/01/22/how-to-monetize-google-image-search-traffic/</link>
		<comments>http://nailsblog.com/2010/01/22/how-to-monetize-google-image-search-traffic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 14:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cldnails</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Making Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Image Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monetizing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nailsblog.com/?p=553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let me get this out of the way, I do NOT have the end all answer to monetizing search traffic that originates from Google Image Search.  Traditionally image search traffic does not convert well and requires different methods of monetization than content search traffic.  I've done a lot of looking around the guru sites and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me get this out of the way, I do NOT have the end all answer to monetizing search traffic that originates from Google Image Search.  Traditionally image search traffic does not convert well and requires different methods of monetization than content search traffic.  I've done a lot of looking around the guru sites and no one seems to have a solid answer on what works best for monetizing a website that depends on image searches for their visitors.</p>
<p><a title="britepic" href="http://www.britepic.com/">BritePic</a> looks like a good place to start and will require some more testing before I'm convinced it's not actually causing a higher bounce rate.  The problem is that my visitors are viewing my website through Google's frames, which hides the majority of my site.  I've tried the script that breaks Google's Image Search frame, but had negative results after a few months, meaning lower image search numbers.  I'd rather keep my non converting traffic and find another way to monetize.</p>
<p>Back to BritePic's issues.  I'm not convinced that BritePic script images are searchable and hold as much weight as a normal image post would.  Therefore I wouldn't be bringing in the traffic to monetize against anyway.  Lastly, my visitors are more likely to view the enlarged image than just hover over the medium sized image on my blog.  Angered visitors, visitors lost, still no monetary gain from image search traffic. <img src='http://nailsblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>In conclusion, I feel the only way to properly monetize image search traffic is with better affiliate banner and text ad placement.  This comes with it's own set of problems, like how much blending is too much, and is <a title="Google Ad Placement" href="http://nailsblog.com/2010/01/08/keeping-adsense-legal/">Google going to be upset</a> about where you place the block of ads.  They tend to frown upon a large block above an image and directly below your post title.  I believe they want more content next to the ad, rather than a simple block next to a block which can potentially confuse a visitor into a click.</p>
<p>So far, it looks like Adsense still converts the best with Image Search traffic, but requires placement above the image, but around actual content.  I failed miserably when trying to place <a title="Chitika Ads" href="http://chitika.com/publishers.php?refid=grayline">Chitika Ads</a> at the top of a blog post, which has no qualms about where it's placed in relation to post title and image.  Chitika Premium ads still look like they convert the best at the bottom of a post, for whatever reason.</p>
<p>More testing is required, but I wanted to get this quick post out, which harbors some of my thoughts and issues.  I'm sure there is a quality solution to monetizing Google Image Search traffic and it may be the next big thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nailsblog.com/2010/01/22/how-to-monetize-google-image-search-traffic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gmail Sticking On Load Screen In Chrome</title>
		<link>http://nailsblog.com/2010/01/18/gmail-sticking-on-load-screen-in-chrome/</link>
		<comments>http://nailsblog.com/2010/01/18/gmail-sticking-on-load-screen-in-chrome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cldnails</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gMail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nailsblog.com/?p=551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google Chrome has refused to open gMail for the past few weeks, however loading in basic html has solved the problem.  This is not my ideal fix and frankly frustrating since Chrome was built by the same folks over at Google who created gMail.  Why can't your products just work together?  Well, they should, so [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Chrome has refused to open gMail for the past few weeks, however loading in basic html has solved the problem.  This is not my ideal fix and frankly frustrating since Chrome was built by the same folks over at Google who created gMail.  Why can't your products just work together?  Well, they should, so I immediately started blaming my new Chrome extensions, like <a title="gMail Checker Extension for Chrome" href="https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/mihcahmgecmbnbcchbopgniflfhgnkff">Google Mail Checker</a>.</p>
<p>After disabling, uninstalling, and generally tweaking I decided that the gMail Checker extension for Chrome was not the culprit.  The problem can best be described as some sort of loop issue when gMail loads, causing the load screen to stick.  This problem can be solved by clearing Chrome's cache.</p>
<p>To clear Chrome's cache:</p>
<ol>
<li>Left click the Tools drop down menu. (The Tools drop down menu is indicated by a wrench icon in the top right corner of your browser.)</li>
<li>Select Options.</li>
<li>Select the Personal tab.</li>
<li>Under Browsing Data, select Clear browsing data...</li>
<li>Select the Cache check box.</li>
<li>Select Everything, from the drop down menu.</li>
<li>Finally click the Clear Browsing Data button.</li>
</ol>
<p>After following these steps I've been able to successfully open gMail in my Chrome browser.  I've also been able to use the gMail Checker extension, without causing any issues.  Hope this helps your problem as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nailsblog.com/2010/01/18/gmail-sticking-on-load-screen-in-chrome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chrome Now Allows Pop Ups For Websites</title>
		<link>http://nailsblog.com/2010/01/15/chrome-now-allows-pop-ups-for-websites/</link>
		<comments>http://nailsblog.com/2010/01/15/chrome-now-allows-pop-ups-for-websites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cldnails</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[popups]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nailsblog.com/?p=546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of my largest pet peeves with using Google Chrome in the work place was that there was not an option to allow popups from a webpage.  Each time there was a popup you would have to manually allow it, instead of setting a rule that allowed all popups from a single website.  Apparently I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my largest pet peeves with using Google Chrome in the work place was that there was not an option to allow <a title="Chrome Popups" href="http://nailsblog.com/2009/05/20/how-to-allow-pop-ups-in-chrome/">popups</a> from a webpage.  Each time there was a popup you would have to manually allow it, instead of setting a rule that allowed all popups from a single website.  Apparently I wasn't the only one and now the latest stable version of Chrome allows for this rule to be set.</p>
<p>How to allow popups in Google chrome.</p>
<h3>Allow pop-ups</h3>
<p>Sometimes you don't want pop-ups to ever be blocked for a certain site. If that's the case, follow these steps to allow pop-ups:</p>
<ol>
<li>Visit the site where you want pop-ups to always appear.</li>
<li>Click the <strong>Pop-ups Blocked</strong> alert at the bottom right-hand corner of the browser tab.</li>
<li>Select <strong>Always show pop-ups from (site)</strong>.</li>
</ol>
<p>If you want to change this setting for the site at a later point, follow these steps:</p>
<ol>
<li>Visit the site again.</li>
<li>Click the <strong>Manage pop-ups</strong> alert at the bottom right-hand corner of the browser tab.</li>
<li>Deselect <strong>Always show pop-ups from (site)</strong>.</li>
</ol>
<p>Now Chrome becomes  a viable alternative in my work place, where popups are required to view pdf's.  Thanks to the development team Chrome is becoming better and better every day, even now allowing for plugins and addons.  I forsee a day when Chrome gives FireFox a run for it's money, I just hope it doesn't cause hard feelings.</p>
<p><img id="myFxSearchImg" style="border: medium none; position: absolute; z-index: 2147483647; opacity: 0.6; display: none;" src="%3D" alt="" width="24" height="24" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nailsblog.com/2010/01/15/chrome-now-allows-pop-ups-for-websites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pepperjam Network and AutoPartsWarehouse.com</title>
		<link>http://nailsblog.com/2010/01/14/pepperjam-network-and-autopartswarehouse-com/</link>
		<comments>http://nailsblog.com/2010/01/14/pepperjam-network-and-autopartswarehouse-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cldnails</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Making Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pepperjam network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nailsblog.com/?p=544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Honeymoon is over PJN, time to start offering as many linking options as CJ in regards to the advertisers you carry.  I still stand behind my statements that the Pepperjam Network is one of the best online, but they are only as good as the tools they offer.  From where I'm setting, Pepperjam Ads just [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honeymoon is over PJN, time to start offering as many linking options as CJ in regards to the advertisers you carry.  I still stand behind my statements that the <a title="Sign Up To Pepperjam Network" href="http://nailsblog.com/2009/01/16/why-sign-up-to-pepperjam-affiliate-network/">Pepperjam Network is one of the best online</a>, but they are only as good as the tools they offer.  From where I'm setting, <a title="Pepperjam Ads" href="http://nailsblog.com/2009/02/23/pepperjam-in-text-ads/">Pepperjam Ads</a> just isn't cutting the mustard.  Lastly, for the life of me I can't get Pepperjam Store to convert, so what does work?</p>
<p>Currently on my automotive website I'm taking a much more proactive approach at attracting visitors for very specific products.  AutoPartsWarehouse.com seems to have plenty of products that can turn into a virtually endless amount of content for me to write about, but how best to link to what I'm trying to sell?  With Pepperjam my options are limited to banners, coupons, and some text links, however Commission Junction offers some fantastic Advanced Link options.</p>
<p>Specifically within AutoPartsWarehouse.com link catalog on CJ you are able to create interactive product searches.  More importantly there are figures published on CJ that prove these types of linking strategies work.  So why hasn't PJN offered these advanced links yet?  Is it a problem with Pepperjam or with the individuals in charge of AutoPartsWarehouse.com's affiliate program?</p>
<p><img id="myFxSearchImg" style="border: medium none; position: absolute; z-index: 2147483647; opacity: 0.6; display: none;" src="%3D" alt="" width="24" height="24" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nailsblog.com/2010/01/14/pepperjam-network-and-autopartswarehouse-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>After Christmas Slump In Earnings</title>
		<link>http://nailsblog.com/2010/01/13/after-christmas-slump-in-earnings/</link>
		<comments>http://nailsblog.com/2010/01/13/after-christmas-slump-in-earnings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cldnails</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Making Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holidays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nailsblog.com/?p=542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has been a dry year so far in 2010, at least with my revenue stream.  Only thing I can come up with is that people have went on lock down with their typical spending patterns, now that the holidays are over.  Or, perhaps, I've been targeting the wrong products and niche for New Years [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has been a dry year so far in 2010, at least with my revenue stream.  Only thing I can come up with is that people have went on lock down with their typical spending patterns, now that the holidays are over.  Or, perhaps, I've been targeting the wrong products and niche for New Years resolutions. When all reality, I didn't plan for the New Year at all, lesson learned.</p>
<p>In previous years I had niches that were under high demand, year round, but this year I'm not so fortunate.  My websites have remained constant with their visitors and actual statistics, unfortunately the buying has dropped off dramatically.  So it got me thinking about the next holiday coming up and how I can better prepare for what consumers will be after.  I just hope I'm not too late to the game because I've been setting on my laurels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nailsblog.com/2010/01/13/after-christmas-slump-in-earnings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
